Here is another open forum that Jake chooses not to respond in, but chooses to start his own blog in which to do so.

http://www.rollingdoughnut.com/2009/10/science_requires_ethics_revisi.html

Here is his personal blog, which at present is NOT moderated. Since he has gotten responses not favorable, I wonder when he will start "moderating" this one.

http://circumcisionnews.blogspot.com/2009/10/in-ongoing-inter-blog-discussion-about.html

Jake's new debating tactic

Jake Wasket has been profusely debating circumcision online in open forums for years advocating circumcision. Lately he has had little success, so it seems he is trying a new tactic...

He now does not respond directly on the open forum, he merely directs people to his response on his own blog where he can control the content, as in this example..

http://www.rollingdoughnut.com/2009/10/science_requires_ethics.html#comments

His site:

http://circumcisionnews.blogspot.com/2009/10/analysing-analysis-of-analysis-of.html

I responded on his site and a few went though fine--after questioning the tactics he was using, he deleted my responses.

When I continued questioning HIS responses, he started to moderate the response under the pretext that I was indulging in repetition by continuing to request answers tocrucial and scientific questions, all the while offering nothing but repetition of HIS question.

It seems he is more comfortable debating when he can censor what is posted.

I am inviting people who have come upon this new tactic to post their experiences here--as well as inviting Jake's comment